NEW ZEALAND COLONIAL PARLIAMENT
REPEALS THEIR RIGHT TO GOVERN
Even though successive Colonial Parliaments have had their own interpretations of New Zealand’s Constitution, it was the David Lange led de facto Parliament that went so far as to repeal the New Zealand Constitution Act of 1852 and Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act 1947. This completely VOIDED all successive Colonial Parliaments of any right to even exist. At the same time, the de facto Parliament unlawfully enacted their own Constitution trying to created a modern version of New Zealand history with the Constitution Act of 1986.
The New Zealand Constitution Act of 1852, was enacted by Westminster Parliament to replace the New Zealand Constitution Act of 1846, as the British Settlers were unable to purchase land and make settlements. This replacement Constitution Act in1852, had a provision in section 71, which guaranteed Maori Sovereign rights of the Unextinguished Native Title to New Zealand.
The Statutes of Westminster Act 1831, was adopted by the New Zealand Colonial Parliament in 1947, which continued British Crown protection for the Maori Nation with “Section 8. Saving for Constitution Acts of Australia and New Zealand” that reads:
Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to confer any power to repeal or alter the Constitution or the Constitution Act of the Commonwealth of Australia or the Constitution Act of the Dominion of New Zealand otherwise than in accordance with the law existing before the commencement of this Act.
This simply means the laws existing before this Act were binding on the New Zealand Parliaments and the British Crown, which included the Declaration of Independence the Treaty of Waitangi and New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, which recognize Maori Sovereignty and formed part of New Zealand’s common law.
The New Zealand Constitution Act of 1852, was enacted by Westminster Parliament to replace the New Zealand Constitution Act of 1846, as the British Settlers were unable to purchase land and make settlements. This replacement Constitution Act in1852, had a provision in section 71, which guaranteed Maori Sovereign rights of the Unextinguished Native Title to New Zealand.
The Statutes of Westminster Act 1831, was adopted by the New Zealand Colonial Parliament in 1947, which continued British Crown protection for the Maori Nation with “Section 8. Saving for Constitution Acts of Australia and New Zealand” that reads:
Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to confer any power to repeal or alter the Constitution or the Constitution Act of the Commonwealth of Australia or the Constitution Act of the Dominion of New Zealand otherwise than in accordance with the law existing before the commencement of this Act.
This simply means the laws existing before this Act were binding on the New Zealand Parliaments and the British Crown, which included the Declaration of Independence the Treaty of Waitangi and New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, which recognize Maori Sovereignty and formed part of New Zealand’s common law.
WESTMINSTER VOIDS NZ CONSTITUTION 1986
WITH NEW IMPERIAL STATUTES
WESTMINSTER’S answer to the Lange Parliament was to slam its attempt to establish an Independent Parliament through it's self serving Constitutional Enactment in 1986. The Westminster Parliament enacted into New Zealand statute law, the Imperial Laws Applications Act 1988, whereby section 5., reinstated England’s common law into New Zealand law which reaffirmed the Crown’s recognition of the Native Title. The repealed Imperial Constitution Act of 1852, eliminated forever all subsequent New Zealand Parliaments rights to govern.
Furthermore, Westminster with the aid of Her Majesty Queen's Regents resident in New Zealand enacted Te Ture Whenua Maori/Maori Land Act 1993 (hereinafter “TTWMA”), assented into New Zealand statute law 21, March 1993. This protectorate provides the Maori people with a modern day Constitution with provisions in the preamble that reaffirm the TOW in that it recognized the established special relationship between the Maori people and the Crown. And whereas it is desirable that the spirit of the exchange of Kawanatanga (Dominion of New Zealand) for the protection of Rangatiratanga (Chieftainship to freely exercise Tikanga Laws, Customs, and Usages) embodied in the Treaty of Waitangi be reaffirmed: And whereas it is desirable to recognize that land is a taonga tuku iho (Treasure from our Creator) of special significance to Maori people and, for that reason, … and to protect wahi tapu: and to facilitate the occupation, development, and utilization of that land for the benefit of its owners, their whanau, and their hapu. And whereas it is desirable to maintain a court and to establish mechanisms to assist the Maori people to achieve the implementation of these principles.
Pursuant to Section 253 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 and its amendments, Whanau and Hapu (Hereditary Chiefs, families and extended families) have to-date established Maori Incorporations to exercise their full rights, powers, and privileges, by Special Resolution of Whanau and Hapu within their Respective Territories. Section 268 (3) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Act 1994, provides for Maori Incorporations to alter, add to, or replace its Constitution, by Special Resolution and the Maori Incorporations Constitution Regulations Act 1995, Amended in 2000 and 2005 have been implemented in accordance with the teachings of the Maori Chief Justice Joseph E. Murphy III, Queen’s Regent, Her Majesty’s British Order and Queens Counsel in residence. Within the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Maori/Maori Land Act 1993 section 2, (3), provides in the event that the English version and the Maori version conflict, then the Maori version shall prevail over Pretend Parliaments which is binding on the Crown and Pretend Parliaments in accordance with Section 5.
Furthermore, Westminster with the aid of Her Majesty Queen's Regents resident in New Zealand enacted Te Ture Whenua Maori/Maori Land Act 1993 (hereinafter “TTWMA”), assented into New Zealand statute law 21, March 1993. This protectorate provides the Maori people with a modern day Constitution with provisions in the preamble that reaffirm the TOW in that it recognized the established special relationship between the Maori people and the Crown. And whereas it is desirable that the spirit of the exchange of Kawanatanga (Dominion of New Zealand) for the protection of Rangatiratanga (Chieftainship to freely exercise Tikanga Laws, Customs, and Usages) embodied in the Treaty of Waitangi be reaffirmed: And whereas it is desirable to recognize that land is a taonga tuku iho (Treasure from our Creator) of special significance to Maori people and, for that reason, … and to protect wahi tapu: and to facilitate the occupation, development, and utilization of that land for the benefit of its owners, their whanau, and their hapu. And whereas it is desirable to maintain a court and to establish mechanisms to assist the Maori people to achieve the implementation of these principles.
Pursuant to Section 253 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 and its amendments, Whanau and Hapu (Hereditary Chiefs, families and extended families) have to-date established Maori Incorporations to exercise their full rights, powers, and privileges, by Special Resolution of Whanau and Hapu within their Respective Territories. Section 268 (3) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Act 1994, provides for Maori Incorporations to alter, add to, or replace its Constitution, by Special Resolution and the Maori Incorporations Constitution Regulations Act 1995, Amended in 2000 and 2005 have been implemented in accordance with the teachings of the Maori Chief Justice Joseph E. Murphy III, Queen’s Regent, Her Majesty’s British Order and Queens Counsel in residence. Within the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Maori/Maori Land Act 1993 section 2, (3), provides in the event that the English version and the Maori version conflict, then the Maori version shall prevail over Pretend Parliaments which is binding on the Crown and Pretend Parliaments in accordance with Section 5.
The 1986 Colonial de facto Parliament ignores the pre-existing legal doctrine of 'Native Title' as part of New Zealand law, that the British Crown had long since acknowledged and recognized. As Judge Chapman put it in the case of Queen verses Symonds 1847, that the Native Title cannot be extinguished. It was by Imperial Statutes (Westminster Parliament) that the New Zealand Colonial Parliaments, obtained their rights to govern the Queen’s subjects on Sovereign Maori soil and by its own hand, the Lange Parliament extinguished it’s right, and that of all successive Parliament’s to govern even over Her Majesty's subjects on the soil in New Zealand; and certainly never to govern Maori.
The current Colonial Parliament Corporation is beyond the scope of its corporate powers to govern and thus all its acts and actions are ultra vires. For the Colonial de facto Parliament Pretender to claim their independence from the Crown upon a modern version of New Zealand history and govern accordingly is to proclaim that they are in fact lawless.
The current Colonial Parliament Corporation is beyond the scope of its corporate powers to govern and thus all its acts and actions are ultra vires. For the Colonial de facto Parliament Pretender to claim their independence from the Crown upon a modern version of New Zealand history and govern accordingly is to proclaim that they are in fact lawless.
